One of the most common misconceptions about open source software (OSS) is that the market lacks sustainability. The argument goes something like this: a team of OSS developers who ’sell’ their product to users for little or no cost will eventually fall apart as they see their peers becoming financially successful by adopting a more commercial approach. Proponents of this view argue that inevitable economic market forces essentially negate the sustainability of the open source market.
Fortunately for open source enthusiasts, both logical argument and historical evidence contradict the “lack-of-sustainability” theory.
The Test of Time
Many people hold the notion that open source projects will generally fade away when confronted with large commercial opponents. However, while market pressures can and do play a role in the OSS community (see next section), history shows us that OSS projects are surprisingly durable and resilient - perhaps more so than their proprietary counterparts.
For example, while the fate of commercial software is almost inextricably tied to the fate of its parent development company, open-source applications have a life of their own. When a commercial product’s company goes defunct or is “bought out,” the product is also likely to be scrapped or shredded into pieces for use in other applications. OSS, on the other hand, is not bound to any particular person or entity, though it is typically supported by a core group of programmers and innovators. If the original developers give up on a project, it is perfectly possible for users to jump in and fill the gap.
Some of the world’s most influential and important pieces of software are based on open source products. Software like the increasingly popular operating system Linux and the BIND system which is at the very core of the internet’s functionality are all examples of how important OSS can be.
Profitability and Open Source Software
There is no inherent contradiction between profitability and low-cost or free OSS. Though the connection between open source software and profit is more indirect than, say, selling software as a product, a strong connection nonetheless exists.
For example, many companies have found it to be in their business interests to support open-source initiatives. A company whose industry is well served by a particular OSS application could gain a competitive advantage by funding and participating in the development process. Participation in such projects is also often a worthwhile publicity campaign for those involved - leading, though indirectly, to increased profit.
The barrier is creativity. As the open source market evolves and expands, it changes the rules of the existing market. Those who can learn these rules and adapt to them the fastest are the ones who will benefit the most.
For more information on open source software, visit http://www.mpoweropen.com
Joseph Devine
Tags: free open source, nonprofit open source software, open source software, open source software download
No comments yet
There are no comments yet, be the first!